Rebalancing - how much is too much? Feeling a bit exposed right now.
- •Okay, so I've been doing my yearly portfolio rebalance and it's got me scratching my head a bit this time around.
- •I'm sitting on around a $220k portfolio right now – a good mix of my 401k, a traditional IRA, and then the Gold IRA I set up a few years back.
- •Generally, I like to keep my gold around 10-15% of my overall holdings as a hedge, especially with how things have been bouncing around lately.
Okay, so I've been doing my yearly portfolio rebalance and it's got me scratching my head a bit this time around. I'm sitting on around a $220k portfolio right now – a good mix of my 401k, a traditional IRA, and then the Gold IRA I set up a few years back. Generally, I like to keep my gold around 10-15% of my overall holdings as a hedge, especially with how things have been bouncing around lately. I'm an insurance agent here in Omaha, so I see firsthand how quickly things can change on the ground, and that always reinforces my diversified approach.
The thing is, with the recent run-up in gold prices, my Gold IRA has actually pushed past 20% of my total portfolio. I mean, I'm not complaining about the gains, believe me! But now I'm wondering if I should trim some of that back down to my target allocation. My gut says "stick to the plan," but the thought of selling off a chunk of something that's performing so well feels a little counter-intuitive, even if it's just to rebalance. I've always thought of my gold as a long-term hold, a safe haven, not something I'm actively trading.
Am I overthinking this? For those of you who also hold gold in your retirement accounts, how strict are you with your target percentages? Do you let things run a bit when they're hot, or do you always rebalance back to your predetermined allocation, no matter what? I'm debating just letting it ride for another year or two and re-evaluating then, but then I worry about being too heavily weighted in one asset class if there's a correction. Any thoughts folks?