The Metals Company’s seabed exploration license application passes regulatory milestone
- •You can check it out here: The Metals Company’s seabed exploration license application passes regulatory milestone .
- •Honestly, this one has me a bit conflicted.
- •On one hand, the sheer scale of those polymetallic nodules – 1.02 billion tonnes in a 122,000 km2 area – is pretty mind-boggling.
Hey everyone, just read this article about The Metals Company getting their seabed exploration license application for the USA B area past a regulatory milestone. You can check it out here: The Metals Company’s seabed exploration license application passes regulatory milestone.
Honestly, this one has me a bit conflicted. On one hand, the sheer scale of those polymetallic nodules – 1.02 billion tonnes in a 122,000 km2 area – is pretty mind-boggling. With the way EV demand is going, and the need for these critical metals, it’s hard to ignore the potential here. I’ve been looking at some of the EV battery plays for my retirement portfolio, and a reliable, long-term source of these raw materials would definitely be a game-changer. My kids are growing up in a world that's going to need more and more of this stuff, so the supply chain argument is strong. However, deep-sea mining just sounds… risky. I remember reading about some of the early offshore oil drilling issues, and this feels like a whole new level of environmental impact. It's not something I've invested in directly before, so I'm trying to wrap my head around the pros and cons.
What do you all think? Is this a huge opportunity we can't afford to ignore, or are the environmental risks too significant? Has anyone here invested in any deep-sea mining companies, or even companies that might benefit from this kind of resource extraction? Curious to hear some other perspectives on how this might play out, both for the markets and for the planet.