New woe besets British Columbia’s two biggest gold projects
- •Man, it seems like there's always something.
- •It just goes to show how many moving parts there are in mining, way beyond just the geology and economics.
- •I'm always looking for ways to diversify my gold exposure that might be less susceptible to these regional permitting issues.
Hey everyone,
Just read this article over on Mining.com about some more drama for gold projects in BC: "New woe besets British Columbia’s two biggest gold projects". Man, it seems like there's always something. The bit about Seabridge's KSM project getting permit delays because of their legal spat with Tudor Gold (and the BC government basically saying 'sort yourselves out first') really jumped out at me. I've been following KSM for a while, even have a small position in Seabridge, thinking it's a solid long-term play for my retirement portfolio given the sheer size of the resource. But these constant permitting headaches, environmental hurdles, and now inter-company legal battles… it makes you wonder if these projects will ever get off the ground efficiently. It’s tough watching your investments stall out due to red tape and corporate squabbles, especially when you’re banking on that gold to help put your kids through college someday.
It just goes to show how many moving parts there are in mining, way beyond just the geology and economics. I'm always looking for ways to diversify my gold exposure that might be less susceptible to these regional permitting issues. It's why I've been exploring options like physical gold and even looking into a Gold IRA. Actually, I was checking out this Gold IRA Blueprint tool just the other day to see if I even qualify. It asks a few questions to give you an idea if it's a good fit, which is pretty handy. Anyway, what do you all think about this news from BC? Anyone here invested in Seabridge or Tudor? Does this sort of thing change your outlook on investing in resource-heavy regions like BC?