Rolling over a chunk of my 401k into Palladium - self-directed vs traditional custodian?
- •I've been heavy on gold and silver for years, but Palladium's looking more and more attractive given the industrial demand.
- •My big question for you all is about the custodian.
- •With a portfolio in the low 7 figures already, a few extra basis points on fees here or there for more control might be worth it.
Alright, so I'm finally getting around to rolling over a good chunk of my old Wall Street 401k into a Precious Metals IRA, specifically looking at Palladium. The market feels like it's teetering on the edge, and between the inflation numbers and everything else, I'm just more comfortable knowing a good chunk of my wealth is in tangibles. I've been heavy on gold and silver for years, but Palladium's looking more and more attractive given the industrial demand.
My big question for you all is about the custodian. I'm trying to decide between a fully self-directed IRA with a more niche custodian, or just sticking with one of the big boys like Fidelity or Schwab, who'd then use their preferred metals custodian. Fidelity's been alright for me for decades, but I'm thinking a self-directed option might give me more direct control over the specific Palladium products (certain coins, bars, etc.) I want to hold. With a portfolio in the low 7 figures already, a few extra basis points on fees here or there for more control might be worth it. Is there anyone out there who's had a significantly better or worse experience with one over the other for a Palladium-focused IRA?
I'm in NYC, so pretty much any custodian is accessible, but I really value transparency and ease of access to information. I don't want to be calling some offshore number every time I have a question about my holdings. What kind of fees should I be scrutinizing most closely when comparing these options? Are there any hidden costs I should be aware of, especially with Palladium since it's a bit more specialized than gold or silver?