Does coin grading *really* matter for my Gold IRA?
- •Okay, so I'm a bit torn here.
- •I own a jewelry store out here in Providence, and I've been in the precious metals game for decades.
- •I know my stuff when it comes to gold fineness, spot prices, all that jazz.
Okay, so I'm a bit torn here. I own a jewelry store out here in Providence, and I've been in the precious metals game for decades. I know my stuff when it comes to gold fineness, spot prices, all that jazz. I started a Gold IRA a few years back, got about $75k in it right now, mostly in American Gold Eagles because they’re easy, reliable, and everyone knows them.
My question is about coin grading for these IRA assets. I mean, common sense tells me a higher grade means more value, right? If I'm buying a 1 oz Gold Eagle, a 'mint state' coin should fetch a premium compared to something that's been handled or has minor imperfections. But within the IRA, it feels a bit… theoretical. It’s not like I’m going to be pulling these out to sell individually any time soon. They're locked up with the custodian, and when it comes time for distributions, the focus will primarily be on the gold content, no? Or at least, that's how I understand the IRS rules for IRA-approved gold.
I'm weighing the extra cost of buying graded coins versus just sticking with bullion-grade eligible items. It’s hard enough making sure everything is IRS-compliant without adding another layer of complexity and potential cost. Are the premiums for graded coins (like MS70 versus MS69) truly worth it inside a retirement account? Or is that just more relevant for numismatic collectors who are actively trading?
Speaking of retirement, I'm trying to get a handle on future distributions. I'm 61 now, so RMDs aren't too far off. I was actually just looking at the RMD Calculator to get a rough idea of what to expect when I hit 73. Does anyone know if the grade of the coin impacts how the custodian values the assets for RMD purposes? Or is it purely based on the spot price of the gold content?