Eagles vs. Buffalos - My Two Cents as a Gold IRA Guy (and what I actually hold)
- •Okay, so this is a classic debate, and one I've spent a fair bit of time agonizing over for my own IRA.
- •If you're purely looking at it from a "most gold for your buck" perspective, the Buffalo is usually the winner.
- •It's 24k pure gold, so you're not paying for that copper/silver alloy that's in the Eagle.
Okay, so this is a classic debate, and one I've spent a fair bit of time agonizing over for my own IRA. Full disclosure: I was a bank manager for years before I got out of that rat race, and the one thing I learned is diversification is king, even within a single asset class. For my Gold IRA, which is now sitting comfortably over the quarter-million mark, I've got a mix, but the Eagles and Buffalos definitely take up the lion's share.
My take? If you're purely looking at it from a "most gold for your buck" perspective, the Buffalo is usually the winner. It's 24k pure gold, so you're not paying for that copper/silver alloy that's in the Eagle. For my IRA, that purity was a big draw. I like knowing I'm holding pure gold, especially for a long-term hold in a retirement account. However, and this is a big however, the Eagle's durability thanks to that alloy is no joke. If you're handling them a lot, or just generally worried about wear and tear, the Eagle is more robust. I live in Portland, and while I'm not exactly carrying my gold around in a backpack, it's a consideration for anyone who might want to physically inspect their holdings more often.
Personally, I ended up with a slightly higher allocation of Buffalos in my IRA, probably 60/40 over Eagles. Why? That 24k purity just feels... more 'gold' to me for a retirement asset. The 22k Eagles are fantastic, don't get me wrong, and their historical recognition is unparalleled. If I were stacking for a potential SHTF scenario where I needed smaller, universally recognized units, I might leans more heavily into Eagles. But for a diversified retirement portfolio focused on pure asset value, the Buffalo slightly nudges it for me. What are you all thinking for your own larger allocations? Anyone got a strong argument for 100% one or the other in an IRA?