American Eagles vs. Buffalos for my Gold IRA - what's the consensus?
- •Okay, so I've been doing a deep dive into putting some serious capital into a Gold IRA.
- •Coming from a tech background, I'm used to everything being hyper-optimized, and this space feels a little...
- •The main question I keep coming back to is American Gold Eagles vs.
Okay, so I've been doing a deep dive into putting some serious capital into a Gold IRA. Coming from a tech background, I'm used to everything being hyper-optimized, and this space feels a little... different. I'm based in SF and exited my last startup about a year ago, so I've got a decent chunk of change sitting around – somewhere in the $400k range I'm looking to diversify, and gold seems like a no-brainer for stability.
The main question I keep coming back to is American Gold Eagles vs. American Gold Buffalos. On one hand, the Eagles have that 22k durability and perceived wider recognition. On the other, the Buffalos are pure 24k and just look so damn good. I'm leaning heavily towards the Buffalos for the purity, but my broker (who seems decent, but I'm always skeptical of anyone selling me something) is pushing Eagles pretty hard, citing the "fractional availability" and "liquidity" if I ever needed to sell smaller portions from my IRA.
My planned investment tranche is probably looking at something like $150k-$200k in gold initially. Is the 22k vs 24k really that big of a deal for an IRA holding? Are the premiums usually wildly different between the two? And honestly, how much does the "liquidity" argument hold water when we're talking about taking distributions from an IRA decades from now? Anyone here have strong feelings one way or the other, especially those who've actually gone through the process of taking distributions from a Gold IRA? I'm trying to get a pulse check beyond just the sales pitches.